So, actresses who flaunt their fur coats instead of natural possessions should remember that there is PETA waiting for you to hunt you down, for your insensible cruelty. We have seen the intensity of PETAâs war against the use of fur coats through that commercial in which Pamela Anderson stripped the travelers off their cruel fur coats. Now, will this PETA sit idly watching when an actress behave and talk in way endorsing the use of fur? No, never.
The story so far. Actress Brooke Shields traveled to Denmark’s Kopenhagen Fur workshop to design a mink coat with the help of design house J. Mendel.
Moreover, her dialogue was more provocative- I will wear the fur garment when I follow my children to school, when I drink coffee and when I sleep.
Oh, it made PETA to see red. It severely criticized Brooke Shields . We understand that when some actors’ careers begin to fade, they’ll do just about anything to stay in the limelight, including appearing in eyelash-growing commercials and starring in short-lived TV shows.- The PETA statement says.
Really? Well, PETA may be right. Because they are the most eligible authority to substantially predict the publicity gimmicks.
But Brooke, did you really want the world to remember you as a ‘fur pimp’ who stares agog at rows of animal skins? It continues.
Oh, do you Brooke? Do you?
Via: Zimbo
